Thank you for sharing your Thank you for sharing your personal experience to dispute an illogical definition of marriage. Often I have thought about the same logical disputes, for the same reasons you listed.
Biologically, there is no difference between an infertile, straight couple (due to health, age, or choice), and a same-sex couple.
The law limiting marriage to straight couples due to “accidental” children, if accurately applied, would eliminate child-less heterosexual couples, as you’ve stated. It’s obvious that the law has not been accurately applied. So, essentially, a subset of society has been breaking the law for decades without any legal consequences.
Meanwhile, almost all of the child-less couples and individuals have contributed to the financial, social, and educational welfare of society’s children for the benefit of our nation – a nation which has refused to strike down illogical laws preventing same-sex couples to marry.
Comments (2)
Lori Kendall
Thank you, Holli. Beautifully
Thank you, Holli. Beautifully said.
Suzanne Coleman
Thank you for sharing your
Thank you for sharing your personal experience to dispute an illogical definition of marriage. Often I have thought about the same logical disputes, for the same reasons you listed.
Biologically, there is no difference between an infertile, straight couple (due to health, age, or choice), and a same-sex couple.
The law limiting marriage to straight couples due to “accidental” children, if accurately applied, would eliminate child-less heterosexual couples, as you’ve stated. It’s obvious that the law has not been accurately applied. So, essentially, a subset of society has been breaking the law for decades without any legal consequences.
Meanwhile, almost all of the child-less couples and individuals have contributed to the financial, social, and educational welfare of society’s children for the benefit of our nation – a nation which has refused to strike down illogical laws preventing same-sex couples to marry.
Comments are closed.